Midjourney Turns the Tables: Demanding Hollywood’s AI Files
Midjourney wants Hollywood’s own AI files revealed. Skip to content
Navigation
- News
- Events
- TNW Conference
- June 19 & 20, 2025
- All events
- TNW Conference
- Newsletters
- Partner with us
- Jobs
- Contact
Latest
- Deep tech
- Sustainability
- Ecosystems
- Data and security
- Fintech and ecommerce
- Future of work
Conference Media Hub
- Startups and technology
- Investors and funding
- Government and policy
- Corporates and innovation
- Podcast
- Artificial Intelligence
Midjourney turns the tables, demanding the studios suing it reveal their AI
Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. are suing Midjourney for training on their characters. Now, Midjourney has asked a judge to force the studios to hand over their own AI files, arguing they do the very same thing behind closed doors.
July 6, 2026 – 11:28 am
Image by: Canva / Midjourney
The studios suing Midjourney claim it trained AI on their characters without permission. Midjourney’s response: prove you do not do exactly the same thing.
The AI image generator wants a US federal judge to intervene. It has asked the court to force the studios suing it to reveal how they use AI internally, as reported by Variety. This sharp turn in a copyright fight could reshape how AI models are trained.
How we got here
Disney and Universal sued Midjourney in June 2025, accusing it of enabling mass infringement of characters like Darth Vader, Bart Simpson, and Elsa. They called the tool a “bottomless pit of plagiarism.” Warner Bros. Discovery joined in September, citing Superman, Batman, and Bugs Bunny, demanding $150,000 for each infringed work. Midjourney’s defense is fair use: training on public images is legal.
Turning the tables
Now, Midjourney wants to see the studios’ homework. In a motion filed this week, it asked Judge John Kronstadt to compel the studios to hand over far more. This includes their AI business plans, research reports, training datasets, model weights, and board presentations on AI. A magistrate judge had limited disclosure to “consumer-facing” tools in June. Midjourney wants that overturned.
The logic rests on a doctrine called “unclean hands.” Its attorney, Bobby Ghajar, stated bluntly:
"If Plaintiffs are doing the very thing they seek to punish, that evidence goes to the heart of Midjourney’s fair use and unclean hands defenses."
His example: a studio quietly training image models on unlicensed content to storyboard its films. That would make the practice an “industry custom.”
The studios push back
The studios call it a stunt. Their lead lawyer, David Singer, dismissed the request as a “fishing expedition.” The studios “do not seek to stop AI technology or even shut down Midjourney’s business,” he wrote. They just want it to stop copying their characters. That is a right “any copyright holder would assert against any infringer, AI-powered or otherwise."
The studios are not AI abstainers, though. Disney planned a $1bn deal to put its characters on OpenAI’s Sora, which collapsed after Sora shut down. Disney said it would still work with AI that respects intellectual property. That is the grey area Midjourney is trying to pry open.
Why it matters
The stakes stretch well beyond one case. A ruling that studios must expose their own training data could redraw the line on AI and copyright. It lands at a tense moment:
- Publishers are suing AI firms, while some rights-holders have quietly struck licensing deals instead.
- Courts elsewhere are already testing who is liable for what AI produces.
- If Midjourney wins its discovery fight, Hollywood’s own AI experiments become evidence.