Some Prop Firms Profit from Failure
Skip to content
Toggle Navigation
News
Events
TNW Conference
All Events
Newsletters
Advertise with us
Jobs
Contact
Some prop firms profit from failure. Paid evaluations let many prop trading firms earn money when traders fail. Only 14% of traders passed their challenge, after spending roughly $800 across three attempts. Pay-after-you-pass models such as LEVERAGED’s Turbo Trade move most of that cost to after the trader succeeds.
September 15, 2026 – 11:42 am
A trading desk with price charts on several screens.
Credit: Jakub Żerdzicki on Unsplash
The appeal of prop trading starts with a genuine problem around access to capital.
45% of people who don’t invest said they simply did not have enough money to do so. Talented traders lack enough capital to turn skill into returns. Proprietary firms are an alternative. They give capable traders the opportunity to manage substantially larger portfolios without first accumulating that capital themselves.
A prop trading firm supplies the capital, the trader supplies the strategy, and both sides share the upside. But along the way, much of the prop trading industry built a very different business around it.
For many aspiring traders, the first step toward a funded account is a paid evaluation or “challenge.” Pay a fee, trade a simulated portfolio under strict profit and drawdown rules, and earn access to a funded account if you pass. Fail, and the fee is gone. Want another shot? Buy another challenge.
The challenge cycle adds up. That cycle quickly adds up. Only 14% of traders passed their challenge and obtained a funded account. The average account spent roughly $800 on challenges, typically across three attempts.
That means 86% of traders do not pass, with money spent on expensive challenges and nothing to show for it.
A prop firm built around upfront evaluation fees does not need, or may not even want, traders to succeed to generate revenue. Every failed challenge generates another fee, and every repeat attempt can produce another on top of that. The trader enters the relationship trying to stop paying and start earning. The firm generates significant revenue before that ever happens.
Not every challenge-based prop firm is automatically predatory. Evaluations serve a legitimate purpose. Firms need some way to identify disciplined traders and filter out people taking reckless risks with large nominal portfolios. The problem is when the evaluation itself becomes the product.
A healthy prop business should have a strong economic reason to find good traders, develop them and keep them trading. When failure becomes lucrative, that alignment is weaker.
Pay after you pass
A new generation of prop firms is starting to attack that problem at the pricing level. LEVERAGED’s Turbo Trade model, for example, allows traders to begin a one-step evaluation for less than $9 rather than paying the full simulation fee upfront. The larger activation fee becomes due only after the trader successfully completes the evaluation.
The $8.88 initial platform fee is credited toward that activation cost.
That change has a big effect on incentives. A trader who fails has only put less than $9 at risk rather than hundreds of dollars. And if they were looking to proprietary trading to bridge a lack of capital, it does not actively profit off them in a predatory fashion.
This low cost entry exam has far more reason to identify traders capable of reaching the next stage, because its profit comes from the value proposition of prop trading that successful traders will generate revenue for both parties.
In other words, passing becomes more valuable to its business model. Simultaneously, proving trading savvy does not require making a large financial bet.