Skip to content

164news.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy

The SEC staff agreed data centre securitisation sits outside Dodd-Frank risk retention

Posted on August 18, 2026 By Emily Chen No Comments on The SEC staff agreed data centre securitisation sits outside Dodd-Frank risk retention

Data Centre Securitisation Excluded from Dodd-Frank Risk Retention

The SEC staff has ruled that data centre securitisations fall outside the scope of Dodd-Frank’s risk retention rules. This decision was made in response to a query from Latham & Watkins on July 23, 2026.

The Ruling Context

On July 29, Kayla Roberts, chair of the SEC’s Office of Structured Finance, confirmed the staff’s agreement with Latham’s interpretation. The central question was whether data centre securitisations qualify as asset-backed securities under the Exchange Act.

Latham & Watkins’ Argument

Latham argued that data centres do not meet the definition of a self-liquidating financial asset, a key requirement for asset-backed securities. They pointed out that:

  • Data centres are tangible and physical assets that endure beyond the life of the securities.
  • They may appreciate in value over time.
  • Upon repayment of the notes, the issuer retains ownership of the building.

This argument was compared to a single-asset commercial mortgage deal, where the issuer holds only the loan and has no remaining asset after repayment.

Market Impact and Structure

Latham highlighted the growth of the data centre securitisation market since 2018, reaching $50 billion in cumulative debt issuance. The deals typically involve:

  • Loan-to-value ratios up to 70% of appraised value.
  • Notes with anticipated repayment dates around five years, extending to final maturities between 25 and 30 years.
  • Master trust structures enabling sponsors to issue further securities, add data centres, or dispose of assets.

SEC Staff Response

The SEC response clarifies several points:

  • The views expressed are those of the Division of Corporation Finance staff, not the full Commission.
  • It has "no legal force or effect."
  • The ruling is based on the information provided in Latham’s letter and may change with different facts or conditions.
Clock

Post navigation

Previous Post: GitHub disputes Wiz’s claim that Copilot Autofix wrote a Snowflake flaw
Next Post: Cursor Origin is on by default for paid users, and its data terms are unpublished

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editor's Picks

  • brooklyn-real-estate-legal-services
  • New York Bankruptcy Expert
  • NYC Employment Law Firm
  • Long Island Business Litigation Lawyer
  • Bronx DWI Defense Attorney
  • Brooklyn Small Business Legal Advice
  • New York Personal Injury Attorney
  • NYC Construction Law Specialist
  • NY Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Manhattan Family Law Specialist

Recent Posts

  • Border Construction in Big Bend Is Halted After Drawing Criticism
  • Synchrony wants your Amazon and Walmart store cards inside ChatGPT
  • ByteDance signs a copyright pact with Hollywood’s MPA to rein in its Seedance AI video tool
  • Jeff Gundlach says making AI chips an asset class looks like a market top
  • Supreme Court Again Rejects Trump’s Appeal of $5 Million E. Jean Carroll Payment

Recent Comments

  1. tamubetlogin on AMD raises $4.75bn in its biggest ever bond sale
  2. m711casino on The Gadget That Fixed My Screen-Time Habit
  3. betmexicobono on Max Miller, Accused of Abuse, Is Not Stepping Aside. Here’s What We Know.
  4. idjayaslot on China’s new AI bottleneck isn’t chips. It’s running out of Chinese-language training data.
  5. 7f777game on They Were Voted Out. They Refuse to Leave. Now What?

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026

Editor's Picks

  • brooklyn-real-estate-legal-services
  • New York Bankruptcy Expert
  • NYC Employment Law Firm
  • Long Island Business Litigation Lawyer
  • Bronx DWI Defense Attorney
  • Brooklyn Small Business Legal Advice
  • New York Personal Injury Attorney
  • NYC Construction Law Specialist
  • NY Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Manhattan Family Law Specialist

Copyright © 2026 164news.com.

Powered by PressBook Dark WordPress theme