Trump’s Campaign Against State AI Regulation Faces Resistance
The Trump administration is waging a multi-front campaign to prevent states from regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI), employing various strategies such as:
-
DOJ Litigation Task Force: Established by Executive Order 14365, this task force challenges state AI laws in federal court, arguing that they impose unconstitutional burdens on interstate commerce.
-
Commerce Department Evaluations: The Secretary of Commerce is tasked with identifying and evaluating "burdensome" state AI laws by March 11th.
-
Legislative Framework: The administration proposes a national standard for AI regulation, urging Congress to preempt state-level legislation with what they consider a minimally burdensome approach.
However, states have shown a contrasting trend, with 1,208 AI bills introduced in 2025 and 145 enacted, demonstrating a push towards stricter AI regulations. Congress has also rejected preemption attempts, notably with a 99-1 Senate vote against including an AI moratorium in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
State Representative Doug Fiefia’s Experience
Doug Fiefia, a first-term Republican state representative from Utah and former Google salesperson, had his bill, House Bill 286 (Artificial Intelligence Transparency Act), face resistance from the White House. The bill aimed to require frontier AI companies to publish safety and child-protection plans and included whistleblower protections for employees raising safety concerns. It passed a House committee unanimously but was subsequently killed by the White House.
Fiefia received a letter from the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs on February 12th, stating their opposition to the bill, describing it as "unfixable" and against the administration’s AI agenda. Despite Fiefia’s efforts to maintain states’ rights, particularly under a Republican administration, his bill was viewed as a threat by the federal government.
The Federal Architecture and EU Tech Scene
The Trump administration’s campaign emphasizes three key components:
-
Challenging State Laws: Through the DOJ task force, they contest state AI laws in court, citing interstate commerce burdens or federal preemption.
-
Evaluating State Legislation: The Commerce Department identifies "burdensome" state AI laws, potentially setting the stage for further legal challenges.
-
Promoting National Standards: They advocate for minimal national standards, aiming to preempt state-level regulation through legislative means.
The federal architecture, as outlined by the administration, presents a direct challenge to state autonomy in regulating emerging technologies like AI.